Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
От | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Тема | Re: NOTICE vs WARNING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 04f701c371bd$2360cd10$2800a8c0@mars обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: NOTICE vs WARNING (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: NOTICE vs WARNING
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> In fact, I like the criterion that a warning should be raised rather than > a notice if the effect of the command deviates from what the command > actually says. That puts the messages for serials, primary keys, drop > cascades clearly into notices, messages about missing, implicitly added, > or changed syntax clauses into warnings. > > I don't think the dump reload scenario is particularly important. After > all, psql or pg_restore don't act differently upon notice or warning, it's > just something that the user reads. WARNINGs don't cause transaction rollback, right? Cos if they did, changing NOTICEs to WARNINGs would cause pain. Chris
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: