Re: Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_xid
| От | David Steele |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_xid |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 04a5991a-829d-435e-8ff6-e898197e31dc@pgbackrest.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_xid (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/4/26 23:19, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 12:41 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: >> My earlier comment was based on my misunderstanding. I thought that only >> 32-bit transaction IDs were allowed for recovery_target_xid, and therefore >> values larger than 2^32 should be rejected. >> >> However, recovery_target_xid currently accepts both 32-bit XIDs and 64-bit >> full transaction IDs (epoch + 32-bit XID). When a 64-bit value is specified, >> only the 32-bit XID portion is used as the recovery target. >> Given this behavior, your change seems to make sense. > > I'm tempted to clarify this behavior by adding something like > the following text to the description of recovery_target_xid > in config.sgml...: > > ------------------------------- > The value can be specified as either a 32-bit transaction ID or a 64-bit > transaction ID (consisting of an epoch and a 32-bit ID), such as the value > returned by pg_current_xact_id(). When a 64-bit transaction ID is provided, > only its 32-bit transaction ID portion is used as the recovery target. > For example, the values 4294968296 (epoch 1) and 8589935592 (epoch 2) > both refer to the same 32-bit transaction ID, 1000. > > The effective transaction ID (the 32-bit portion) must be greater than > or equal to 3. > ------------------------------- +1. I added this to the v3 patch. Regards, -David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: