> On Jan 7, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson@lists.simkin.ca> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 11:58 -0900, Israel Brewster wrote:
>>>
>> Really? Why? With the update I am only changing data - I’m not adding
>> any additional data, so the total size should stay the same, right?
>> I’m obviously missing something… :-)
>>
>
> PostgreSQL keeps the old row until it gets vacuumed, as it needs to be
> visible to other transactions. Not only that, but every index record
> gets updated to point to the location of the new data row too (excluding
> HOT), and those old index blocks also need to get vacuumed. And none of
> those rows can get removed until your update finishes.
>
> I know this isn't universally true with HOT and fillfactor etc. but with
> an update this big I think it's safe to say most of the space will get
> doubled.
>
> Plus you'll get a ton of write-ahead logs.
Gotcha. Batches with VACUUM it is! Thanks for the info.
---
Israel Brewster
Software Engineer
Alaska Volcano Observatory
Geophysical Institute - UAF
2156 Koyukuk Drive
Fairbanks AK 99775-7320
Work: 907-474-5172
cell: 907-328-9145
>
>
>