Re: TRUNCATE question
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TRUNCATE question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 03f001c11bc1$962dda30$2205010a@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | TRUNCATE question ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Makes for a real pain when the nice and safe foreign keys aren't really nice and safe anymore. -- Rod Taylor Your eyes are weary from staring at the CRT. You feel sleepy. Notice how restful it is to watch the cursor blink. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Mascari" <mascarm@mascari.com> To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> Cc: "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] TRUNCATE question > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > > > Is TRUNCATE supposed to be equivalent to DELETE FROM blah? > > > > Because I notice that DELETE triggers are not called when you truncate a > > table... Isn't that a bad thing? > > It's supposed to work that way - same as Oracle. > > Mike Mascari > mascarm@mascari.com > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: