On 10/01/2017 04:22 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
>> Well these kinds of monitoring systems tend to be used by operations
>> people who are a lot more practical and a lot less worried about
>> theoretical concerns like that.
>
> +1, well said.
>
>> In context the point was merely that the default
>> pg_stat_statements.max of 5000 isn't sufficient to argue that 32-bit
>> values are enough. It wouldn't be hard for there to be 64k different
>> queries over time and across all the databases in a fleet and at that
>> point it becomes likely there'll be a 32-bit collision.
>
> Yeah.
>
> I think Alexander Korotkov's points are quite good, too.
>
+1 to both of these as well.
jD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://pgconf.us
***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers