Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Дата
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B8856D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?  (Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:reedstrm@rice.edu]
> Sent: 13 January 2003 15:16
> To: Vince Vielhaber
> Cc: Dan Langille; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
>
>
> And there was a statement upthread from someone (Marc?)
> indicating that the bandwidth was down in the noise for them
> (as an ISP).

I think that was Vince talking about 1 mirror. The January stats to date
(bear in mind it didn't go live until the 4/5th Jan), for the Portal and
idocs *only* (ie, not including gborg, techdocs, developer, user-lounge,
archives, fts, pgadmin, odbc, jdbc or ftp) are:

Total Hits 1339547
Total Files 1064536
Total Pages 324346
Total Visits 58178
Total KBytes 2712883

In other words, 2.7Gb in 8/9 days.

I'm not sure I'd call that noise :-)

Regards, Dave.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vince Vielhaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?
Следующее
От: Vince Vielhaber
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL site, put up or shut up?