Re: PITR Dead horse?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: PITR Dead horse?
Дата
Msg-id 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B872071C@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PITR Dead horse?  (Austin Gonyou <austin@coremetrics.com>)
Ответы Re: PITR Dead horse?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicolai Tufar [mailto:ntufar@pisem.net]
> Sent: 05 February 2004 00:01
> To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PITR Dead horse?
>
> Totally agree. Robustness and rock-solidness are the only
> things missing for PostgreSQL to become the killer of certain
> commercial enterprise databases out there.

Well I've only been using PostgreSQL since 1997 and the *only* release I
ever had problems with was 6.3.2. We also use(d) Informix SE, DB2,
Unidata and SQL Server and only Informix and Unidata come close to the
robustness of PostgreSQL - and they're not the ones we need to worry
about.

Now I'm not saying we shouldn't be continually looking to improve
things, but I don't think this is quite the problem you imply.

Regards, Dave.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR Dead horse?
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PITR Dead horse?