Re: 'greatest' function?
От | Adam Rich |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 'greatest' function? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 038c01c74b37$bbeb6840$6400a8c0@dualcore обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 'greatest' function? (brian <brian@zijn-digital.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 'greatest' function?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
I don't see greatest or least anywhere on that page... But they ARE here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/functions-conditional.htm l#AEN13140 -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of brian Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 10:07 PM To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 'greatest' function? jws wrote: > Is there any buil-in function to return the lesser of two numbers? > > i.e. lesser(100,125) would return 100. > > Do I need to roll my own? > Which is it--greatest or least? No matter, TFM has something to say about it: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-math.html#FUNCTI ONS-MATH-FUNC-TABLE brian ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: