Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c )
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 038a01c1c05f$bd5ded00$8001a8c0@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Arch (was RE: Refactoring of command.c ) ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Imagine you want to develop a massive new feature for Postgres. You just > create a branch on your own machine, do all your changes, commits, etc. and > keep it current with the main branch. Then, you can merge it back into the > main tree... That way you can have a history of commits on your own branch > of the repo! The same thing can be accomplished with CVS as well -- it's just not as pretty. There is a reason that the FreeBSD group uses $FreeBSD$ and leaves $Id$ untouched. Basically, check out of one, drop CVS directories, check into the second, check out of the second, and when doing work with either repository you specify which repo with the -D flag. Coupled with the -j (merge) flag you can accomplish most tasks. That said, if the work was thought through and beneficial you may be able to obtain a branch in postgresql cvs to work with.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: