Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order(regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

On 08.12.2018 6:58, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>   I have no idea what you mean here. I'm proposing a patch that stops
> it being a game of chance, while preserving the existing
> slightly-random behavior to the greatest extent possible. I think that
> my patch would have stopped that problem altogether. Are you
> suggesting that it wouldn't have?

I did many tests of your solution inside the 'quick vacuum' strategy [1] 
and the background worker called 'heap cleaner' [2]. I must admit that 
when I  use your patch, there is no problem with dependencies.
This patch needs opinion of an another reviewer.

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/425db134-8bba-005c-b59d-56e50de3b41e%40postgrespro.ru
[2] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/f49bb262-d246-829d-f835-3950ddac503c%40postgrespro.ru

-- 
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional
https://postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company