> > According to that logic, a view is a table, but we still require DROP
VIEW
> > to drop a view.
>
> No, a view is not a table. Try putting an index or trigger on it.
It seems to me to be more correct that we make DROP TYPE not work on
domains. I refer to the principle of least surprise... People EXPECT it to
not work, therefore it shouldn't :)
There exists a perfectly good other command (drop domain) that works, and
you can't go alter type..add check(...) on a domain. Also, we don't want to
encourage people to use commands that maybe we might remove in the future...
Chris