Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
Дата
Msg-id 0353e30e-3254-6ec4-a832-9ca3215b00b2@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017  (Peter van Hardenberg <pvh@pvh.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/13/17 3:09 PM, Peter van Hardenberg wrote:
> A new data type, and/or a new index type could both be nicely scoped
> bits of work.

Did you have any particular data/index types in mind?

Personally I'd love something that worked like a python dictionary, but 
I'm not sure how that'd work without essentially supporting a variant 
data type. I've got code for a variant type[1], and I don't think 
there's any holes in it, but the casting semantics are rather ugly. IIRC 
that problem appeared to be solvable if there was a hook in the current 
casting code right before Postgres threw in the towel and said a cast 
was impossible.

1: https://github.com/BlueTreble/variant/
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PoC: Grouped base relation