Re: Confused about CASE

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Adam Rich
Тема Re: Confused about CASE
Дата
Msg-id 031301c87b2e$d4951030$7dbf3090$@r@sbcglobal.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Confused about CASE  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Confused about CASE
Список pgsql-general
> I wanted to use the following statement to "translate" the relkind
> column to a
> more descriptive value:
>
> select c.relname
>         case
>           when c.relkind in ('t','r') then 'table'
>           when c.relkind = 'i' then 'index'
>           when c.relkind = 'S' then 'sequence'
>           when c.relkind = 'v' then 'view'
>           else c.relkind
>         end as mykind
> from pg_class c
> ;
>
> The idea is that for anything else than 't', 'r', 'i', 'S' or 'v' it
> should
> simply return the value of relkind. In the other cases I want "my"
> value.
>
> But for some reason this returns the value of relkind for all rows.
> When I
> remove the "else c.relkind" part, it works as expected.


I agree, this seems confusing.  I found a section of the doc that caught my
eye:

"The data types of all the result expressions must be convertible to a
single output type."

Which led me to try this, which works:

select c.relname,
        case
          when c.relkind in ('t','r') then 'table'
          when c.relkind = 'i' then 'index'
          when c.relkind = 'S' then 'sequence'
          when c.relkind = 'v' then 'view'
          else c.relkind::text
        end as mykind
from pg_class c



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Confused about CASE
Следующее
От: Stephan Szabo
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Confused about CASE