Re: backup manifests

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Steele
Тема Re: backup manifests
Дата
Msg-id 030216ce-3781-4bfb-d484-33d1a0c3aae3@pgmasters.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: backup manifests  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/29/20 8:33 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 4:32 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> 
>> FWIW, I was thinking of backup_manifest.checksum potentially being
>> desirable for another reason: The need to embed the checksum inside the
>> document imo adds a fair bit of rigidity to the file format. See
> 
> Well, David Steele suggested this approach. I didn't particularly like
> it, but nobody showed up to agree with me or propose anything
> different, so here we are. I don't think it's the end of the world.

I prefer the embedded checksum even though it is a pain. It's a lot less 
likely to go missing.

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: backup manifests
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: fix for BUG #3720: wrong results at using ltree