Re: elog() patch

EXPLAIN would come out as INFO would it not?

--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>;
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2002 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] elog() patch


> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > OK, now that the elog() patch is in, we can discuss NOTICE.  I
know
> > Peter wants to keep NOTICE to reduce the number of changes, but I
> > already have a few votes that the existing NOTICE messages should
be
> > changed to a tag of WARNING.
>
> If you're taking a vote, I vote with Peter.  I don't much care for
the
> thought of EXPLAIN results coming out tagged WARNING ;-)
>
> In any case, simple renamings like this ought to be carried out as
part
> of the prefix-tagging of elog names that we intend to do late in
7.3,
> no?  I see no value in having two rounds of widespread changes
instead
> of just one.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
majordomo@postgresql.org
>