Re: Array iterators
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Array iterators |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 02d101c1fc07$59bf89a0$8001a8c0@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Array iterators ("Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sounds great to me. Mostly why I made the remark that I wasn't happy with the solution due to using type unknown. any and _any it is. -- Rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au> To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca>; "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:10 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Array iterators > Just a small remark, type name "any" would be more meaningfull than > "unknown". Also it's widely used (CORBA for example) and may enter in the > STL someday. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > To: "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> > Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:48 PM > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Array iterators > > I believe that the best ultimate resolution of these problems will > > involve creating a spectrum of "pseudo-types" with different, sharply > > defined meanings. Breaking up "opaque/type 0" is going to cause a > > lot of backward-compatibility pain, so I have not been in a big hurry > > to do it --- but let's get it right the first time when dealing with > > shades of "unknown".
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: