Re: Package support for Postgres
От | Rod Taylor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Package support for Postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 02a601c159cf$adfdd380$8001a8c0@jester обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Package support for Postgres (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Package support for Postgres
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
But what if you want a C function to set a variable which can be accessed using an SQL, perl, PLpgSQL or other function type? Shouldn't a global variable be global between all types of functions? -- Rod Taylor There are always four sides to every story: your side, their side, the truth, and what really happened. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Studenmund" <wrstuden@netbsd.org> To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net> Cc: "PostgreSQL Development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Package support for Postgres > On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > Yes, you're right. Actually, sharing data across PostgreSQL C functions > > is trivial because you can just use global variables in your dlopen > > modules. > > Exactly. That's why I never envisioned "C" or "internal" functions using > package global variables. :-) > > Take care, > > Bill > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: