Re: Restoring large tables with COPY
От | Serguei Mokhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Restoring large tables with COPY |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 029c01c18272$d7c85e80$5dd9fea9@gunn обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Restoring large tables with COPY (Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee>) |
Ответы |
Re: Restoring large tables with COPY
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
----- Original Message ----- From: Marko Kreen <marko@l-t.ee> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:38 PM > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 12:29:07PM -0500, Serguei Mokhov wrote: > > If this thing ever gets through, shouldn't this > > > > > /* placeholders for the delimiters for comments */ > > > *************** > > > *** 151,156 **** > > > --- 153,159 ---- > > > " -h, --host=HOSTNAME database server host name\n" > > > " -i, --ignore-version proceed even when server version mismatches\n" > > > " pg_dump version\n" > > > + " m, --maxrows=NUM max rows in one COPY command\n" > > > > say '-m' > > > > > + " m NUM max rows in one COPY command\n" > > > > and this one too? > > One is for systems that have 'getopt_long', second for > short-getopt-only ones. The '-h, --host=HOSTNAME' means > that '-h HOSTNAME' and '--host=HOSTNAME' are same. I know, I know. I just was trying to point out a typo :) You forgot to add '-' in the messages before 'm'.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: