Re: dropping an unused sequence?
| От | |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: dropping an unused sequence? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 028c01c61013$d6ad6a30$0201a8c0@iwing обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | dropping an unused sequence? (<me@alternize.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-novice |
> <me@alternize.com> writes: >> during table creation i mistakenly had a SERIAL instead of INTEGER type >> for >> a value. i removed the default value (nextval....) for this field. still >> i >> can't drop the old sequence: > > Ideally, SERIAL would prevent you from munging the default expression, > too. What you are doing represents unwarranted tampering with the > implementation of a data type... > > Having said that, if you remove the relevant entry in pg_depend then > you'll be able to drop the sequence. thanks. i'm using EMS SQL Manager 3. when creating a SERIAL data field, it is shown as INTEGER afterwards with the "nextval(..)" default value. thats how and why i was able to make it a "pure" integer ;-) i'll fill a bug report at ems about this. thanks for your fast help, thomas
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: