Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Raimon Fernandez
Тема Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?
Дата
Msg-id 0251DAA7-FF5F-4F83-8F77-05A99EAB2432@montx.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Implementing Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP  (Raimon Fernandez <coder@montx.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 18/12/2009, at 22:55, Tom Lane wrote:

> Raimon Fernandez <coder@montx.com> writes:
>> It's not clear for me if I have to issue a flush or sync after each process of an extended query.
>
> Basically, you send one of these at the points where you're going to
> wait for an answer back.  Sync is different from Flush in that it also
> provides a resynchronization point after an error: when the backend hits
> an error while processing a given message, it ignores following messages
> up to the next Sync.

So I have to send on of these after sending a Parsing comand, a Bind comand, and Execute ?

It's normal that I don't receive nothing if I send a Flush instead of a Sync ?

regards and thanks,


raimon

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: John DeSoi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extended Query, flush or sync ?
Следующее
От: "tamanna madaan"
Дата:
Сообщение: logtrigger/denyaccess triggers removed from master/slave