Re: For review: dbsize patch
От | Michael Paesold |
---|---|
Тема | Re: For review: dbsize patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 024201c57b30$1aec2f20$0f01a8c0@zaphod обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | For review: dbsize patch ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote: > The only remaining function that last week's brief discussion indicated > was required is a replacement for total_relation_size() (or > pg_table_size() as it might now be called). I didn't realise until a > few minutes ago that this function (which is actually broken because it > doesn't handle schemas) was only committed a couple of months ago > (v1.5, > http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/contrib/dbsize/dbsize.sql.in) > > and has therefore never been in a release version. > > So should we include this new feature, and if so, how is it best added > - > rewrite in C, or one long line in pg_proc? IIRC the initially submitted patch for this contained a function written in C. It was only afterwards converted to SQL because of a comment by someone else. I will have a look in the archives. What I would like to have is a function that returns the table size (+ toast) + indexes. If it would be called pg_table_size(), that would be ok. We should have one with oid and another with text. Best Regards, Michael Paesold
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: