Re: byteain bug(?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: byteain bug(?)
Дата
Msg-id 022401c13754$d4065590$0705a8c0@jecw2k1
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: byteain bug(?)  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: byteain bug(?)
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> Should be fixed.  I noticed this myself.  Should we require three digits?
>
>
> > I just noticed some unexpected behavior from byteain:
> >
> >
> > test=# select '\\009'::bytea;
> >  ?column?
> > ----------
> >  \011
> > (1 row)

<snip>

> >
> > It checks for a '\' followed by three digits, but does not attempt to
> > enforce that the three digits actually produce a valid octal number.
Anyone
> > object to me fixing this?
> >

Based on the thread this morning on patches, I was thinking we should allow
'\\', '\0', or '\###' where ### is any valid octal. At least that's what I
was going to have decode(bytea, 'escape') handle.

-- Joe




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: byteain bug(?)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: byteain bug(?)