Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
От | Jordan Henderson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01d101c23ee9$d96d0d60$19c58cac@innerakt обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL? (Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>) |
Ответы |
Table Inheritance Discussion
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg, Well put, I can't agree more. I think even the horse has gotten up and left. I think what would be useful is to discuss the theory part. When we go down that path, we should all be referring to a consistent set of references. There by we can have a common ground from which to talk. In that spirit, I would offer up the following references: - Date has 3, however his most current work is dated 2000, The Third Manifesto SECOND EDITION. -There is the work done by Dr Kim, perhaps 'Modern Database Systems, The Object Model, Interoperability, and Beyond'. - Silberschatz, Korth, Sudarshan, A book I am sure we have all read, Database System Concepts - Third Edition. In any case, we should use the current editions of these books, not something the author has reconsidered, re-written, and published again. Jordan Henderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Copeland" <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> To: "Curt Sampson" <cjs@cynic.net> Cc: "Hannu Krosing" <hannu@tm.ee>; "Don Baccus" <dhogaza@pacifier.com>; "PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 10:31 AM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: