Re: beta testing version
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta testing version |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01c901c05b37$55e67770$0200000a@windows обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta testing version (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: beta testing version
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > No, WAL does help, cause you can then pull in your last dump and recover > > up to the moment that power cable was pulled out of the wall ... > > False, on so many counts I can't list them all. Why? If we're not talking hardware damage and you have a dump made sometime previous to the crash, why wouldn't that work to restore the database? I've had to restore a corrupted database from a dump before, there wasn't any hardware damage, the database (more specifically the indexes) were corrupted. Of course WAL wasn't around but I don't see why this wouldn't work... Note I'm not saying you're wrong, just asking that you explain your comment a little more. If WAL can't be used to help recover from crashes where database corruption occurs, what good is it? -Mitch
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: