Stephen Frost wrote:
> I'm not a particularly big fan of this though because, while I'd
> like to be able to give TRUNCATE permissions I'm not a big fan of SET
> RELIABILITY because it would affect PITR backups.
As far as I have understood the discussion... with WAL archiving turned on,
the whole RELIABILITY changes would be no-ops, no?
Just as the CTAS optimization etc. only skip WAL if WAL archiving is turned
off.
Best Regards,
Michael Paesold