Re: persistent vs. non-persistent
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: persistent vs. non-persistent |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01a301c14ac2$908990d0$1e51000a@mitch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | persistent vs. non-persistent (Martín Marqués <martin@bugs.unl.edu.ar>) |
Ответы |
Re: persistent vs. non-persistent
|
Список | pgsql-php |
> I'm having headaches with PHP, postgres and persistent connections. They never have really worked for me, but I haven't tried with the recent PHP->PGSQL improvements.. > The problem is that my postgres backends stay alive after closing the > connection. That's what a persistant connection is, though... You'll have as many minimum PG backends hanging around as you do minimum apache backends (once that many PG backends get started, they hang around). > I use pg_pconnect to connect to the database, put after closing the > conection, nothing happens, la backend stays alive, and all I can do is > restart apache to make them close (really close). > > Any solution to this? Sure, don't use persistant connections..It sounds like they're the opposite of what you want... -Mitch
В списке pgsql-php по дате отправления: