Re: [EXT]: Re: BUG #18604: Regression in PostgreSQL 16.4: pg_dump Prevents Essential System Table Modifications
От | Christophe Pettus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [EXT]: Re: BUG #18604: Regression in PostgreSQL 16.4: pg_dump Prevents Essential System Table Modifications |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01CF2C94-D153-4687-B2EF-EF4B4B1890DF@thebuild.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #18604: Regression in PostgreSQL 16.4: pg_dump Prevents Essential System Table Modifications (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [EXT]: Re: BUG #18604: Regression in PostgreSQL 16.4: pg_dump Prevents Essential System Table Modifications
Re: [EXT]: Re: BUG #18604: Regression in PostgreSQL 16.4: pg_dump Prevents Essential System Table Modifications |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> On Sep 6, 2024, at 18:40, Basha <Basha@maxcontact.com> wrote: > > I mean the case where, changes to system tables made. pg_dump to do granular control over it. > Which means the pg_dump will work on the dev environments too, when there is a change to the system tables. Anything's possible, but just speaking for myself, that doesn't seem like an attractive area of development. I don't thinkit's possible to guarantee that pg_dump (or anything else) will always work with arbitrary system catalog modifications. The real problem you're trying to solve that that users can discover the existence of databases that they can't connect to. That's much more imaginable, although I'm not sure how practical it would be. At minimum, the default behavior wouldhave to be the same as it is now (or lots of things that work now would break), so introducing a new role privilegeof "can see all databases" wouldn't be a great way forward.
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: