Re: BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work
От | Hiroshi Saito |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 019701c8f70e$1c8fd450$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #4186: set lc_messages does not work (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Magnus. I have tried with Inoue-san, investigation of this problem, and adjustment. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/LC_TIME_PATCH/pg8.3.3-to_char_gettext_format.png Native-strftime was proposed by Tom-san. It corrects(LC_TIME) from 8.3.3.(LC_MESSAGES) http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/LC_TIME_PATCH/ http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/LC_TIME_PATCH/pg_locale_patch It has not resulted in the still final conclusion. However, Possibly this may be the optimal one. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/LC_MESSAGE_CHECK/LC_TIME_PATCH/wcsftimeck.c I am creating the proposal of patch with Inoue-san. Regards, Hiroshi Saito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net> > Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>> Thomas H. wrote: >>>>> so at least that explains the "changed" behaviour. nevertheless, >>>>> LC_MESSAGES seems to be defunct - with the "locale" folder present, >>>>> pg always picks the os' language and ignores the lc_message value. >>>> This looks like I can reproduce though, at least on cvs head. Did this >>>> work for you in previous versions? >>> Maybe we were using a different build of gettext in the previous >>> releases, one that didn't look at the same info as the current code? >>> >>> Anyway the patch mentioned at the start of the thread >>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-02/msg00038.php >>> purports to fix this. It doesn't seem to have gotten reviewed >>> though. >> >> Agreed. Magnus, someone, can we get feedback on the patch at this URL? >> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2008-02/msg00038.php > > IIRC, there was further work to be done on the patch before it was to be > applied, and we held off the review until then. > > Gevik - can you comment on this? Where are we, what needs ot be done still? > > //Magnus > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: