Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution?
От | Hiroshi Saito |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 017101c8ee73$1d81ba70$0c01a8c0@IBMC9A0F63B40D обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG
core distribution?
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext intoPG core distribution? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi. I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still required. http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/ However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me. Regards, Hiroshi Saito From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> > On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote: >> Hi >> >> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to >> Windows users also. >> The idea is to get to the situation >> >> createlang plproxy mydb >> >> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would >> like to hear how. > > If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course > that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: