Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL?
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 015101c0f9c6$5f0ea510$0201a8c0@INSPIRON обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? (Adam Rossi <adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
What makes you think it isn't postgreSQL? Some people are saying that it is. Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Rossi" <adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com> To: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 3:39 PM Subject: [GENERAL] Red Hat DB announced - why not PostgreSQL? > It looks like Red Hat has announced an open source database called Red Hat > Database: > > (via slashdot:) > http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20010619/tc/red_hat_to_play_in_oracle_s_aren a_1.html > > Why is this not PostgreSQL? Why can't the Red Hat folks sell support to > PostgreSQL, rather than developing another open source database and > supporting that? Is it a conflict with GreatBridge? This looks like it could > have been a great opportunity for PostgreSQL.... > > - Adam > > -- > Adam Rossi > President, PlatinumSolutions, Inc. > adam.rossi@platinumsolutions.com > http://www.platinumsolutions.com > P.O. Box 31 Oakton, VA 22124 > PH: 703.471.9793 FAX: 703.471.7140 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: