Re: Connecting remotely.
От | Adam Lang |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connecting remotely. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 014601c04421$d20c39c0$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Connecting remotely. (Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Well, I was mostly feeling out ideas... mainly because I don't know how to write com objects or an OLE DB provider. :P The 6th through the 10th I have a training course for VB and it gets into Active X DLLs and Com objects, so naturally I was thinking of what I would use my new found power for and I thought of that as a possibility. As for the ole db... does anyone have an idea where to start looking for that info? Would it have to be written in C? I found a company that sells software that creates ole dbs... Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> To: "'Adam Lang'" <aalang@rutgersinsurance.com>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 10:32 AM Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: 01 November 2000 14:53 > > Cc: pgsql-interfaces > > Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Connecting remotely. > > > > > > That's what I was figuring... so... is it possible to take > > those files, > > compile them into a dll and make a postgresql-specific remote > > connection > > library? So, say instead of referencing ADO in Visual Basic > > and using the > > ODBC driver, merely wrap up necessary functionality of the client side > > libraries? Would that be hard? (Never made a DLL before, so unsure). > > Many before you have tried this and failed miserably!! :-) > > Seriously though, I think you would be creating a horrendous amount of work > for yourself (having considered the idea for 18 months or so myself). IMHO > time would be far better spent writing an OLEDB provider for PostgreSQL (a > native one, not one using the Simple Provider interface). At least then you > can still manipulate data in recordset objects which aren't really that bad > to work with and are very useful when you attach them to a hidden data > control so you can bind other controls to them. > > Regards, > Dave.
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: