>From the jdbc side it looks like we are pretty much in sync here. I have
applied a few patches and am working on my queue which appears to be
more or less the same as yours.
BTW I got a message from Barry; he and his wife have a new baby and he
will be offline for a while.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 11:26 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patch queue
> > The remaining items are recent and possibly still under discussion.
> > I don't know the latest status on them.
>
> I believe Fernando Nasser's "Allow arbitrary levels of
> analyze/rewriting" is fine. I wasn't happy with the details of
> Brent's "Problem reloading regression database" patch; that still
> needs another iteration. Not sure about the rest. Could you clean
> out the cruft (non-patch items and stuff we've already agreed to
> reject) so it's easier to see what still needs review?
Cleaned out:
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
Patches list down to 33. I know some of our special people will chime
in tomorrow with comments, e.g. jdbc, gist, python, etc.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania
19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly