RE: why no stored procedures?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com
Тема
RE: why no stored procedures?
Дата
Msg-id
013445F6BB17D4119959005004AAEA9A4E1EA6@SPIDERMAN
Список
Дерево обсуждения
why no stored procedures? roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com
Re: why no stored procedures? Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>
RE: why no stored procedures? "Robert J. Sanford, Jr." <rsanford@nolimitsystems.com>
Creating a C function to replace each stored proc is hardly a good solution.
Or is it?  Unfortunately my C skills are rusty at best.

I'm glad to hear that the postgresql developers are attempting to add the
ability to return result sets.  Does anyone have any idea how that is coming
along?  Also are they planning on creating stored procs at all to return
more than one parameter?

Roy.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Conway [mailto:joseph.conway@home.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com; Doug McNaught
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] why no stored procedures?
> 
> PostgreSQL also supports compiled C functions. This feature 
> has significant
> performance advantages over run-of-the-mill stored procedures.
> 
> -- Joe
> 
> 
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Oliver Elphick
Дата:
От: Philip Crotwell
Дата:
FAQ