RE: why no stored procedures?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com
Тема RE: why no stored procedures?
Дата
Msg-id 013445F6BB17D4119959005004AAEA9A4E1EA6@SPIDERMAN
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на why no stored procedures?  (roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com)
Список pgsql-general
Creating a C function to replace each stored proc is hardly a good solution.
Or is it?  Unfortunately my C skills are rusty at best.

I'm glad to hear that the postgresql developers are attempting to add the
ability to return result sets.  Does anyone have any idea how that is coming
along?  Also are they planning on creating stored procs at all to return
more than one parameter?

Roy.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Conway [mailto:joseph.conway@home.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 12:19 PM
> To: roypgsqlgen@xemaps.com; Doug McNaught
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] why no stored procedures?
>
> PostgreSQL also supports compiled C functions. This feature
> has significant
> performance advantages over run-of-the-mill stored procedures.
>
> -- Joe
>
>

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Oliver Elphick"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug#108739: Tablenames should be compiled longer (fwd)
Следующее
От: Philip Crotwell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LARGE db dump/restore for upgrade question