Re: serverless postgresql
От | Rick Gigger |
---|---|
Тема | Re: serverless postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 013401c3db93$62ad5cf0$0700a8c0@trogdor обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | serverless postgresql (Jeff Bowden <jlb@houseofdistraction.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Tom Lane wrote: > > Jeff Bowden <jlb@houseofdistraction.com> writes: > > > >>That makes sense to me. I wonder if sqlite suffers for this problem > >>(e.g. app crashing and corrupting the database). > > > > Likely. I can tell you that Ann Harrison once told me she made a decent > > amount of money as a consultant fixing broken Interbase/Firebird > > database files. It would be hard to make a living in the same game for > > Postgres. Now I don't think that Firebird is any buggier than Postgres. > > But it comes in an embedded-library form; I'll bet lunch that most of > > those data corruption problems were actually induced by crashes of > > surrounding applications. > > Do the developers generally oppose the idea of a threaded (but > non-embedded) backend as well? If the backend is thread-safe, then users > can still choose to run multiprocess or multithreaded right? My impression is that they don't want to go multithreaded. There was some talk of this for the windows port but I belive that Bruce is simply modifying the multi-proccess code so that it will work on windows.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: