Re: 2-phase commit
От | Hiroshi Inoue |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2-phase commit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 012f01c38696$2a33f390$3d283ddb@PbgX обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2-phase commit ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD [mailto:ZeugswetterA@spardat.at] > > > > Example: > > > > Master Slave > > ------ ----- > > commit ready--> > > This is the commit for phase 1. This commit is allowed to return all > sorts of errors, like violated deferred checks, out of diskspace, ... > > > <--OK > > commit done->XX > > This is commit for phase 2, the slave *must* answer with "success" > in all but hardware failure cases. (Note that instead the > master could > instead send rollback, e.g. because some other slave aborted) > > > is the "commit done" message needed ? > > So, yes this is needed Thanks. I misunderstood that the "commit done" message is the last response from the participant to the coordinator. I missed the "OK" message before it. Where were my eyes ? regards, Hiroshi Inoue
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: