Re: [HACKERS] \d and large objects

>
> Currently, \d display all of the tables and indices associated with
> large objects.  Should \d do that?  I find it a bit annoying, but
> that's because our database has about a hundred large objects.
>
> If \d is supposed to do this, how about another command which doesn't
> show the large object tables and indices.

IMO, \d shouldn't do this the same way that it doesn't show the pg_*
system tables.

Psql was broken in the filenames it was looking for to exclude large
objects from listings.  Was looking for "Inv[0-9]+" (Inversion relic?)
instead of "xin[xv][0-9]+".

Did a 'grep "Inv\["' on the src tree and didn't get any hits, so psql
might have been the only place.  Patch sent to patches...


Darren   darrenk@insightdist.com

------------------------------