Re: Noobie: Problems with a query
От | Chris Boget |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Noobie: Problems with a query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 012401c33fe3$375e0320$8c01a8c0@ENTROPY обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Noobie: Problems with a query ("Chris Boget" <chris@wild.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Noobie: Problems with a query
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
> milliseconds. I'll have to see if the rows come back that quickly in pgAdmin > and, if it does, that tells me there is something wrong with the way pgAdmin > does the 'vacuum' and 'vacuum analyze'. If the rows don't come back that > fast, then it'll tell me that there is *alot* of overhead when using pgAdmin to > run queries. Apparently, there is alot of overhead on pgAdminII. *Alot*. When running the query from the command line, it comes back almost immediately. When run- ning the query from pgAdminII, it takes anywhere from betwen 9 seconds to 12 seconds. I ran an EXPLAIN ANALYZE and, from what I could tell, the query was to take .827 millisconds (or something along those lines). I'd paste the results here but sadly the power went out at home last night, while I was working on this, due to the tropical storm that hit the Gulf. Do other people on the list use pgAdminII? Do you notice a performance hit when running a query from pgAdminII versus running it from the command line? Is there anything that I can do to optimize pgAdminII a bit? I doubt it's because of my machine because it's pretty fast. Athlon XP 2100+, 512mb DDR... thnx, Christoph
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: