Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bryan White
Тема Re: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions
Дата
Msg-id 011d01bf7357$4c52b160$2dd260d1@arcamax.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на RE: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions  (Craig Orsinger <orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil>)
Список pgsql-interfaces
> On 09-Feb-00 Bryan White wrote:
> > If I use CREATE FUNCTION for a C function in a .so file and then use the
> > function and then change and recompile the function, what steps are
needed
> > to see the change?
> >
> > As I see it the options are:
> > A: do nothing, the function is reloaded on every invocation.
> > B: Reopen the connection to the backend
> > C: Restart the postmaster
> >
> > I suspect B is correct but I would like to hear someone confirm it.
>
>         I don't know about A or B, but C definitely works :-). If it's
> practical, I sometimes use DROP FUNCTION/CREATE FUNCTION, but I don't
> think this is practical when you're using this function (or set of
> functions) to implement a new data type.

Thanks, I have come to the conclusion that B is sufficient based on trial
and error.




В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Phillip Rhodes
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [INTERFACES] jdbc question
Следующее
От: "Alex Verstak"
Дата:
Сообщение: JDBC primary keys