How to determine whether to VACUUM or CLUSTER
От | Ken Shaw |
---|---|
Тема | How to determine whether to VACUUM or CLUSTER |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 011301c571bf$b83c77f0$800101df@xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: How to determine whether to VACUUM or CLUSTER
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi All, I have an app that updates a PostgreSQL db in a batch fashion. After each batch (or several batches), it issues VACUUM and ANALYZE calls on the updated tables. Now I want to cluster some tables for better performance. I understand that doing a VACUUM and a CLUSTER on a table is wasteful as the CLUSTER makes the VACUUM superfluous. The app does not have a built-in list of the tables and whether each is clustered or not. It looks to me as if the only way to determine whether to issue a VACUUM (on a non-clustered table) or a CLUSTER (on a clustered table) is to query the table "pg_index", much like view "pg_indexes" does, for the column "indisclustered". Is this right? Also, how expensive is CLUSTER compared to VACUUM? Does CLUSTER read in the whole table, sort it, and write it back out? Or write out a completely new file? Is the time for a CLUSTER the same whether one row is out of place or the table is completely disordered? Thanks, Ken
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: