Re: JDBC
От | Peter Mount |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 010c01c01746$660dbda0$6f0010ac@heather обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC (Travis Bauer <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ah, just checked. Bruce applied those changes. I'm thinking we may have the same problem I had with 6.5.3, the changes were in cvs, but didn't get out to the release. Marc, any ideas? Peter -- Peter T Mount peter@retep.org.uk, me@petermount.com Homepage: http://www.retep.org.uk Contact details: http://petermount.com PostgreSQL JDBC: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/ Java PDF Generator: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Travis Bauer" <trbauer@cs.indiana.edu> To: "Peter Mount" <peter@retep.org.uk> Cc: <algobit@algobit.com>; "ML-Postrges-general" <Pgsql-General@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 3:22 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] JDBC > > That's not true. Look at the cvs log for > src/interfaces/jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc2/ResultSet.java > > There are entries for June 7 and June 9. These are changes I made to > ResultSet.java to make it more JDBC2 compliant. These changes are not > in the 7.0.2 release, and the functions I mentioned in the > previous posting do not work properly in the current release. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Travis Bauer | CS Grad Student | IU |www.cs.indiana.edu/~trbauer > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Peter Mount wrote: > > > Nothing has changed since 7.0 was released, so the binaries on www.retep.org.uk/postgres are the current> The compiled form has been available online for at least 3 years now. > > > > Peter >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: