Re: Questions about tuning on FreeBSD...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От postgres@vsservices.com
Тема Re: Questions about tuning on FreeBSD...
Дата
Msg-id 01091023443406.73075@prime.vsservices.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Questions about tuning on FreeBSD...  (Philip Hallstrom <philip@adhesivemedia.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Monday 10 September 2001 18:52, Philip Hallstrom wrote:
> Hi all -
>     I have some questions about tuning the various kernel parameters
> on FreeBSD.  I've read Bruce's article a couple of times and the various
> parts of the documentation, but I still have some questions and was hoping
> people here could confirm/deny my assumptions.
>
> The machine in question has 512 megs of ram and doesn't do anything else
> significant other than postgresql.
>
Depending on the size of your DB, this should do OK...

> As I understand there are two major tuneable parameters:
>
> - shared buffer cache: which I can think of as a sort of RAM-based
> disk cache of recently accessed tables (or parts of tables).  Ideally this
> would be large enough to hold the entire database.  The goal is to make
> this large enough to hold the most commonly accessed tables.
I run with shared buffers = 5120

> - sort memory batch size: this is the amount of memory that *each backend*
> uses to do it's sorts/merges/joins.  If the backend needs more than this
> then it writes to temporary files.  Again the goal would be to make all
> your sorts/merges/joins fit in this size.

Sort Mem = 4096

> The overall goal is to give enough memory to postgresql so that it writes
> to disk as little as possible while making sure that the OS as a whole
> doesn't have to start swapping.  So as a starting point could one install
> the OS, let it run for a bit, see how much memory it's using, see how much
> memory is left and assign most of that to postgresql?
>
>
> Regarding the KERNEL parameters.  I can follow the general rules mentioned
> in the docs for configuring things no problem.  However is there any
> danger in doing that?  Can they be too big?  Or can they only be too big
> in conjunction with giving postgresql too much memory?  In otherwords if I
> set them to something, but don't run postgresql have I affected how the OS
> will run by itself?
>
> Is there a way to determine the maximum number of backends that can be run
> given a given amount of RAM?
>
> Also, if anyone has a Free# SYSV stuff BSD box with 512 ram, what are your
> kernel settings?

options         SYSVSHM                 #SYSV-style shared memory
options         SHMMAXPGS=12288
options         SHMMAX="(SHMMAXPGS*PAGE_SIZE+1)"
options         SHMSEG=256
options         SHMMNI=512
options         SHMMIN=1

options         SYSVMSG                 #SYSV-style message queues

options         SYSVSEM                 #SYSV-style semaphores
options         SEMMNI=256
options         SEMMNS=512
options         SEMMNU=256
options         SEMMAP=256

Note:  Some of these might be WAY TOO high!
I could not find enough docs to tell me, so I just added extra
everywhere....  Maybe some of the experts can pick this apart...

>
> Thanks!
>
> -philip
>
>
On that note:  Could some of the PostgreSQL expert take a look my
number of buffers and the kernel config and tell me if I'm running too
much of anything?

GB

--
GB Clark II             | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
gclarkii@VSServices.COM | General Geek
           CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Fwd: Re: unicode in 7.1
Следующее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: MacOS X Build Fails with 7.1.3