Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01071217120402.08941@bugs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum and 24/7 uptime (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jue 12 Jul 2001 16:42, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Mi? 11 Jul 2001 20:49, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > I most have read badly, but I'm almost sure that I heard that UNDO was > > gonna solve the overload that vacuum does on big DB. > > Which is, in that case, the real status of the future of UNDO? > > UNDO was discussed as a solution for subtransactions and for row reuse > of aborted transactions. I have not heard it for clearing out expire > rows caused by DELETE or UPDATE. But the discussion started with a long mail from Tom who dropped the a posible solution of the row reuse of the ones which have been expired by DELETE or UPDATE. Saludos... :-) P.D.: If there is someone interested in the mail Tom send: http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=118484 -- Cualquiera administra un NT. Ese es el problema, que cualquiera administre. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Marques | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: