Re: Re: OpenOffice compile
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: OpenOffice compile |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 01052811071009.17025@bugs обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OpenOffice compile ("Craig Orsinger" <orsingerc@epg.lewis.army_mil.invalid>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 22 May 2001 22:57, you wrote: > In article <200105221405.f4ME5OG13140@candle.pha.pa.us>, "Bruce Momjian" > > <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > > Off topic, but I thought this was interesting. This is information > > about compiling OpenOffice. Hope PostgreSQL never gets to be this size: > > > > http://www.openoffice.org/FAQs/build_faq.html > > IMHO, basing an open project on 7.6M lines of code that can only > compiled on four or five different architectures isn't a policy that > anyone should emulate. I think that the problem with OpenOffice is that it comes from StarOffice. Last time I downloaded SO was 5.2 and had over 70MB of binary, compressed. Anyway, I don't think you can get it smaller, but, as the people of OpenOffice are doing, you can always split it up, modularize it, so it is easy to make changes. P.D.: Linux kernel hasquite an amount of lines of code, but the developers have no problem finding bugs and all the stuff. Saludos.... :-) -- Cualquiera administra un NT. Ese es el problema, que cualquiera administre. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Marques | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: