> > This leaks (columns + 1) per query, 4 bytes in your case. But is has
> > been there in 7.0 as well.
>
> Ooops, my bad --- repeating my test shows process growth in 7.0 as well.
> I had missed it the first time because I'd previously done a plain
> "select *", which ballooned the process footprint of psql. So the
> leakage was happening within previously-grabbed memory and wasn't
> obvious in "top".
>
> This doesn't seem to actually be related to Denis' problem, but a
> leak is a leak ...
Is this is the same leak? I mean I do not use psql in any mean...
--
Sincerely Yours,
Denis Perchine
----------------------------------
E-Mail: dyp@perchine.com
HomePage: http://www.perchine.com/dyp/
FidoNet: 2:5000/120.5
----------------------------------