Re: Re: List response time...
От | Mitch Vincent |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: List response time... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 010001c12a87$92ab3590$1251000a@mitch обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | List response time... ("Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho@alcor.concordia.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I've had great luck with Postfix as well. -Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ian Lance Taylor" <ian@airs.com> To: "Lamar Owen" <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> Cc: "Serguei Mokhov" <sa_mokho@alcor.concordia.ca>; "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:24 PM Subject: [HACKERS] Re: List response time... > Note that the postgresql.org mail server is still running sendmail. > In my personal experience with sources.redhat.com, qmail is a much > better choice to handle large mailing lists. When we switched from > sendmail to qmail, mailing list delays dropped from hours, or > sometimes even days, to seconds. > > Ian > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: