Re: adminpack and pg_catalog

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: adminpack and pg_catalog
Дата
Msg-id 00f801c6f4ee$2d5a25d2$6a01a8c0@valehousing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на adminpack and pg_catalog  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Ответы Re: adminpack and pg_catalog  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers

-----Original Message-----
From: "Neil Conway" <neilc@samurai.com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Sent: 21/10/06 02:03
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] adminpack and pg_catalog

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 22:59 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Nothing except initdb should add objects in pg_catalog.  AFAICS,
> adminpack doesn't have any special requirements, so it should behave
> like all other contrib modules.

> Okay. Are there any opinions on whether we should make this change to
> contrib/adminpack now (i.e. during the 8.2 beta), later (for 8.3), or
not all at?

If you change it you will make it useless as pgAdmin won't necessarily find the functions it expects. You might as well
justremove it (which will almost certainly cause delays to pgAdmin - and pgInstallers - release as I'll need to find
timeto put it all back how it was). 

Regards, Dave

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] zic with msvc
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: adminpack and pg_catalog