Re: beta testing version
От | Magnus Naeslund\(f\) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta testing version |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00e601c05c8e$b466c7c0$020a0a0a@totalmef обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta testing version ("xuyifeng" <jamexu@telekbird.com.cn>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
From: "Nathan Myers" <ncm@zembu.com> > On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 07:02:01PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > [snip] > The logging in 7.1 protects transactions against many sources of > database crash, but not necessarily against OS crash, and certainly > not against power failure. (You might get lucky, or you might just > think you were lucky.) This is the same as for most databases; an > embedded database that talks directly to the hardware might be able > to do better. > If PG had a type of tree based logging filesystem, that it self handles, wouldn't that be almost perfectly safe? I mean that you might lose some data in an transaction, but the client never gets an OK anyways... Like a combination of raw block io and tux2 like fs. Doesn't Oracle do it's own block io, no? Magnus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-Programmer/Networker [|] Magnus NaeslundPGP Key: http://www.genline.nu/mag_pgp.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: