Re: [PATCH] Add Windows support for backtrace_functions (MSVC only)
| От | Bryan Green |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add Windows support for backtrace_functions (MSVC only) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 00e2f579-99d8-4b80-94c0-745612ac2ff5@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add Windows support for backtrace_functions (MSVC only) (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/23/2026 2:16 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > Hello, thanks for following up. > > However, I was going over the commit message one final time after your > reply, and I noticed that SymInitialize()'s documentation says quite > explicitly: > > "Do not use the handle returned by GetCurrentProcess" > https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/dbghelp/nf-dbghelp-syminitialize > > which is exactly what we do with this patch. > > I think we should DuplicateHandle() on the GetCurrentProcess() handle > (which then obviously needs CloseHandle afterwards). Would you agree? > > Here's the whole thing again with edited commit message and some trivial > stylistic changes. > > > I was amused to discover that Solaris, macOS and FreeBSD all copied the > backtrace() interface from glibc, and the only platform in the buildfarm > other than Windows that seems to lack support for backtraces is Alpine > Linux. > > Regards > Ouch. Can't believe I missed that. Yeah, that is a no go. We could use openprocess with the getcurrentprocessid. Let me look this over. And yes, regardless of which way we do it we will need a CloseHandle. -- Bryan Green EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: