Re: Work Around for Oracle Context Indexes?
От | David Griffiths |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Work Around for Oracle Context Indexes? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 00db01c1b8bc$f45ecae0$6601a8c0@griffiths обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Work Around for Oracle Context Indexes? ("David Griffiths" <dgriffiths@boats.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Sorry - the post that showed up this morning was old - I think it got stalled by the software that manages the list. When I saw that it didn't show up after I posted it, I reposted , and got a bunch of answers, and then out of the blue my stalled post re-appears. Thanks for the answers - there was some new info in there (so you didn't waste your time). David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Castle" <dalgoda@ix.netcom.com> Newsgroups: local.ml.postgresql.general Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Work Around for Oracle Context Indexes? > In article <200202181429.g1IETjP12439@candle.pha.pa.us>, > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote: > >Sure, see /contrib/fulltextindex. > > > Is this bit from README.fti still true: > > (this can also be done by using subselects - but subselects are currently > inefficient in Postgres, and maybe there're other ways too). > > If not, would it be better to use joins or sub-selects? > > mrc > -- > Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ > We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen > fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: