Re: Refactoring of command.c

A simple copy works quite well.  Bit of a waste of space but you
preserve the history in both locations.

An empty file will not work.  If someone were to check out an older
version it would be broken.
--
Rod Taylor

This message represents the official view of the voices in my head

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>; "John Gray"
<jgray@azuli.co.uk>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 12:31 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactoring of command.c


> pgman wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > John Gray writes:
> > >
> > > > dbcommands.c rename to database.c (see below)
> > > > indexcmds.c rename to index.c (see below)
> > >
> > > Might as well keep these.  They don't hurt anyone just because
they spell
> > > a little differently.
> >
> > I disagree.  If we are cleaning, let's clean.  *cmd* is redundant.
The
> > contents of the files will be quite different anyway.
>
> Good point about keeping CVS logs.  Can't we just move the CVS file
to
> another name, create an empty file in its place, then delete it.  I
> thought that would move the history.  We have never done it but I
would
> think there is a way to do it.
>
> --
>   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
>   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
>   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
>   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>     (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to
majordomo@postgresql.org)
>